<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>N. Emrah Aydınonat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Invisible Hand in Economics</title>
		<link>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/the-invisible-hand-in-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/the-invisible-hand-in-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aydinonat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Invisible Hand in Economics: How Economists Explain Unintended Social Consequences, INEM Advances in Economic Methodology, London: Routledge, 2008.
Here is the info on the back cover:
This is a book about one of the most controversial concepts in economics: the invisible hand. The author explores the unintended social consequences implied by the invisible hand and discusses [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/the-invisible-hand-in-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	
		<media:content url="http://a.wordpress.com/avatar/aydinonat-128.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aydinonat</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://neaydinonat.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/aydinonat1.jpg?w=188" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">The Invisible Hand</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roots of Modern International Trade Theory</title>
		<link>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/roots-of-modern-international-trade-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/roots-of-modern-international-trade-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aydinonat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This book is in Turkish. It investigates the roots of modern international trade theory by way of examining the theoretical roots of the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem.
Modern Uluslararası İktisat Teorisinin Kökenleri: Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlükler, Neo-Klasik Fiyat Teorisi ve Heckscher-Ohlin Teoremi, Siyasal Yayınevi, Ankara, 2007, in Turkish
The title may be translated as follows: The Roots of Modern International Trade [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/roots-of-modern-international-trade-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	
		<media:content url="http://a.wordpress.com/avatar/aydinonat-128.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aydinonat</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://neaydinonat.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/ho.jpg?w=206" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Models, conjectures and exploration</title>
		<link>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/models-conjectures-and-exploration/</link>
		<comments>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/models-conjectures-and-exploration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aydinonat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Models, conjectures and exploration: an analysis of Schelling&#8217;s checkerboard model of residential segregation, Journal of Economic Methodology, Volume 14 Issue 4, pp. 429 - 454.
Abstract: This paper analyses and explicates the explanatory characteristics of Schelling&#8217;s checkerboard model of segregation. It argues that the explanation of emergence of segregation which is based on the checkerboard model [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/models-conjectures-and-exploration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	
		<media:content url="http://a.wordpress.com/avatar/aydinonat-128.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aydinonat</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game Theoretic Models as a Framework for Analysis</title>
		<link>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/game-theoretic-models-as-a-framework-for-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/game-theoretic-models-as-a-framework-for-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aydinonat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Game Theoretic Models as a Framework for Analysis: The Case of Coordination Conventions, in Aktan, C. C. (ed.) Advances in Economics: Theory and Applications, Vol 2, İzmir: Anıl Matbaacılık, 2006.
Abstract: This paper examines game theoretic models of coordination conventions. Firstly, the paper shows that static models of coordination cannot explain the emergence of coordination conventions. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/game-theoretic-models-as-a-framework-for-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	
		<media:content url="http://a.wordpress.com/avatar/aydinonat-128.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aydinonat</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Invisible Hand un−Smithian?</title>
		<link>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/is-the-invisible-hand-un%e2%88%92smithian-a-comment-on-rothschild/</link>
		<comments>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/is-the-invisible-hand-un%e2%88%92smithian-a-comment-on-rothschild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aydinonat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/is-the-invisible-hand-un%e2%88%92smithian-a-comment-on-rothschild/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aydinonat, N. Emrah, (2006) &#8220;Is the Invisible Hand un−Smithian? A Comment on Rothschild,&#8221; Economics Bulletin, Vol. 2 no. 2 pp. 1-9.
Rothschild (2001) argues that the invisible hand refers to blind individuals and presume privileged knowledge on the part of the social scientist. For this reason, she takes it that the invisible hand is, in fact, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/is-the-invisible-hand-un%e2%88%92smithian-a-comment-on-rothschild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	
		<media:content url="http://a.wordpress.com/avatar/aydinonat-128.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aydinonat</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An interview with Thomas C. Schelling</title>
		<link>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/an-interview-with-thomas-c-schelling-interpretation-of-game-theory-and-the-checkerboard-model/</link>
		<comments>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/an-interview-with-thomas-c-schelling-interpretation-of-game-theory-and-the-checkerboard-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aydinonat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/an-interview-with-thomas-c-schelling-interpretation-of-game-theory-and-the-checkerboard-model/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aydinonat, N. Emrah, (2005) &#8220;An interview with Thomas C. Schelling: Interpretation of game theory and the checkerboard model,&#8221; Economics Bulletin, Vol. 2 no. 2 pp. 1-7.
This note is mainly based on a short interview with Thomas C. Schelling (TCS), who shared the Nobel Prize with Robert J. Aumann in 2005. The interview took place on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://neaydinonat.wordpress.com/2006/08/06/an-interview-with-thomas-c-schelling-interpretation-of-game-theory-and-the-checkerboard-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	
		<media:content url="http://a.wordpress.com/avatar/aydinonat-128.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aydinonat</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>